The House of Commons remains prorogued until Monday, March 24.
Unless there is an earlier recall or some other unexpected scenario, the House will convene under the next Liberal Party leader, who will serve as Prime Minister 鈥 albeit potentially briefly 鈥 until an election is called.
The next Liberal Party leader remains unknown. Earlier this week, rumours circulated in Ottawa that the Trudeau government is preparing a major tariff response plan 鈥 similar in scale to pandemic measures 鈥 should the United States follow through on its threats to impose 25% tariffs on Canadian exports.
While speculation about hypothetical responses based on rumours serves little purpose, the concern about these potential tariffs is very real.
The question of how best to respond weighs heavily on many. While the official opposition has a duty to question the governmentB次元官网网址 political program as part of its challenge function, given the circumstances of where a snap election is conceivable, we have a responsibility to also offer solutions for Canadians to consider.
Today, I would like to share several key objectives that our Conservative opposition believes deserve careful consideration.
To be clear, our Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre supports retaliating against U.S. tariffs, if necessary. However, our Conservative position is also clear that we have to be 鈥渧ery pinpoint and surgical鈥 in our response.
As Mr. Poilievre stated, 鈥淲e鈥檙e both going to lose as Americans and Canadians if we get in a trade war,鈥 adding; 鈥淲e can buy elsewhere to maximize the impact on Americans and minimize the impact on Canadians.鈥
Poilievre also made it clear that a Conservative plan 鈥渨ould target American products and services Canada doesn鈥檛 need or can make in-house鈥 which is an important consideration to mitigate the impact on Canadians.
The Conservative tariff response plan would also include an emergency 鈥渂ring-it-home鈥 tax cut to stimulate economic growth in Canada, increased efforts to reduce and eliminate inter-provincial trade barriers as well as to approve and expedite resource and energy projects as quickly as possible, including out plans to repeal the Trudeau Liberals Bill C-69.
Diversifying trade, particularly in our resource sector not only provides more economic opportunities it also means that by having a lesser dependence on large trading partners we can be less affected by tariff situations in the future.
From my own perspective, I believe the next seven to 10 days will be pivotal in gaining a better understanding of what potential tariffs against Canada might look like.
I also believe we should not lose sight of the fact that in many sectors Canadians can and do compete against some of the very best in the world.
To be at our very best we need a competitive regulatory environment that encourages investment and innovation and at the risk of sounding political, I believe over the Trudeau era we have lost much of that by imposing many politically based regulatory burdens on ourselves that none of our major trading partners are following.
--
Before I close this week, I have one question: How concerned are you about the potential impact of 25% tariffs on Canadian goods exported to the United States鈥攁nd the resulting retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports to Canada?
I can be reached at Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca or call toll-free 1-800-665-8711.
Dan Albas is member of Parliament for
Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola
